Development
-
December 5, 2024

Why Holding Your Team to High Standards Doesn’t Make You a Micromanager

Michel Gagnon
Michel Gagnon
Co-Founder, Stun and Awe

Here’s something we don’t talk about enough as leaders: The word micromanager gets tossed around way too easily. You give feedback? Micromanaging. You point out areas for improvement? Must be hovering. But here’s the real question: are you actually a control freak or are your team members just uncomfortable with being held accountable?

At the heart of this issue is a confusion between micromanagement and high standards. They’re not the same, and as a leader committed to building a strong team and driving results, you need to understand the difference. Let’s set the record straight.

What’s Micromanagement, Really?

Micromanagement gets a bad rap and for good reason. The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as “controlling every part, however small, of an enterprise or activity.” Investopedia takes it further, describing a micromanager as a boss who “gives excessive supervision to employees.” They check and double-check, criticize constantly, resist delegating, and generally treat their team like they can’t be trusted to do their jobs.

Sound familiar? If it does, you’re probably rolling your eyes. Micromanagement stifles creativity and innovation, makes people feel untrusted, and eventually drives even the most motivated employees to disengage. No leader thrives by clinging to control and neither do their teams.

What Are High Standards?

High standards, on the other hand, are your greatest tool as a leader. Setting high standards isn’t about control, it’s about empowerment. It’s about defining what success looks like and coaching your team to achieve it. And yes, it can feel uncomfortable for those who aren’t used to being challenged.

Here’s the thing: High standards demand effort, precision, and accountability. They create clarity around expectations:

  • Quality Expectations: Whether it’s writing code, pitching a client, or delivering a presentation, the standard should be clear. If your team’s work isn’t meeting it, they should hear about it.
  • Productivity Metrics: How fast is fast enough? How often should clients be followed up with? Clear benchmarks help your team know what’s expected.
  • Outcome Goals: High standards focus on results, whether that’s revenue targets, client satisfaction scores, or product adoption rates.

Standards aren’t micromanagement; they’re the backbone of consistency and excellence. They give your team a clear playbook for success and hold them accountable when they fall short.

Leaders: It’s Not Easy, and That’s Okay

Holding your team to high standards can feel like walking a tightrope. On one hand, you want to empower your team, give them autonomy, and build trust. On the other, you know that without accountability, projects stall, performance dips, and you end up fixing problems that should’ve been avoided.

If you’ve ever felt stuck between being “too soft” or “too controlling,” welcome to the club. It’s hard to balance these competing priorities. And it’s even harder when team members push back or label you the "Evil Micromanager". The frustration is real. But great leadership is about navigating that tension with clarity and intention.

I also learned that low-performing employees who tend to dodge accountability are often the ones throwing micromanager labels at their boss.

Feedback Isn’t Micromanagement

Giving feedback doesn’t make you a micromanager, it makes you a leader. If a team member isn’t meeting expectations, someone has to point it out. That’s not hovering, that’s how they grow. Of course, there's a good and bad way of doing this.

When I worked at plista, we were laser-focused on creating a data-driven culture. For too long, decisions were made based on opinions instead of facts. To turn that around, we implemented standards that demanded accountability:

  • Data Before Decisions: Every proposal, idea, or recommendation needed evidence. If someone didn’t have data to back it up, they went back to get it.
  • Structured Meetings: Management meetings started with a review of leading and lagging indicators. Everyone had to come prepared.
  • Clear Tools and Processes: We rolled out tools like PowerBI and HubSpot to ensure every team member had the data they needed to deliver on expectations.

Was it demanding? Absolutely.

Was it perfect? Absolutely not!

But guess what? It worked. Instead of endless debates over “I think” vs. “I feel,” we made more decisions grounded in reality. It wasn’t micromanaging, it was about building a high-performance culture.

Are You Setting High Standards or Micromanaging?

As a leader or founder, it’s important to reflect on your own behavior and check if you’re crossing into micromanagement territory. Here are a few self-check questions to keep yourself accountable:

  1. Am I more focused on the process than the outcome?
    High standards mean defining the goal and letting your team figure out the best way to get there. Micromanaging happens when you dictate every step. Make sure that you set a clear strategy and OKRs, and communicate them continuously.
  2. Do I trust my team to take ownership?
    Micromanagers often struggle to delegate. If you’re checking in constantly or redoing their work, you might be undermining trust. Or you might also have the wrong people on the team.
  3. Is my feedback constructive or overly critical?
    High standards mean providing actionable feedback that helps your team improve. Micromanagement tends to focus on nitpicking without offering solutions.

These questions aren’t just for self-awareness, they’re also a way to course-correct. If you notice signs of micromanagement, shift your focus back to empowering your team to meet the standards you’ve set.

Standards Are Everywhere, and They’re Non-Negotiable

Every high-performing organization operates with standards. Google, for instance, has an entire handbook dedicated to engineering practices, from code reviews to team collaboration. It’s not about stifling creativity; it’s about making sure everyone plays by the same rules. Similarly, Spotify emphasizes autonomy but aligns on best practices through “chapters” to ensure consistency across disciplines.

During my time at plista, I saw firsthand how standards could transform outcomes. By implementing a structured management agenda, demanding data-driven recommendations, and focusing on outcomes over opinions, we created a culture of accountability. The result? Fewer “I think” arguments and more “Here’s what the data shows” discussions.

Ready to Lead with High Standards?

Here’s your challenge: the next time you give feedback, focus on setting clear expectations and being direct about what success looks like. Push your team to rise to the occasion, but trust them to get there in their own way.

High standards aren’t just about your team’s performance, they’re a reflection of your leadership. By finding the balance between accountability and autonomy, you’ll build a team that’s not just good, but exceptional.

Because at the end of the day, it’s not about micromanaging. It’s about refusing to let your team settle for less than their best. And if someone’s not up for that? Well, maybe it’s time for them to step up or step out.

If you’d like to transform your team into a better innovation machine that quickly turns ideas into value-creating products and initiatives, check out our Fast-Track Innovation Workshop. This hands-on workshop will give you the tools, strategies, and mindset needed to run effective MVTs and speed up your time to market.

Start Your MVT Journey

Learn to Execute Faster, Reduce Risks, and Bring New Ideas to Market Faster with our Fast-Track Innovation Workshop.

FAQs

1. How do I know if I'm actually micromanaging or just holding people accountable?

Look at where you spend your energy. If you're dictating how every task should be done, you’re micromanaging. If you’re defining clear outcomes, checking progress at agreed intervals, and giving feedback when the work misses the mark, you’re leading with high standards. Your job isn’t to babysit the process, it’s to protect the outcome.

2. Why do some employees call any feedback “micromanagement”?

Because accountability is uncomfortable especially for low performers. When someone isn’t used to standards, even mild course correction feels like pressure. The label “micromanager” becomes a shield to avoid owning the gap between expectations and execution. You’re not responsible for making feedback painless; you’re responsible for making it clear.

3. Can high standards coexist with autonomy?

Absolutely. High standards require clarity; autonomy requires trust. Your team needs both. Set the bar, define what success looks like, give people space to figure out the “how,” then inspect what you expect. High standards without autonomy suffocate. Autonomy without standards creates chaos. The magic is in the balance.

4. How often should I check in without slipping into micromanaging?

Agree on a cadence upfront weekly, biweekly, whatever the work needs. Random check-ins feel like micromanaging; structured, expected check-ins feel like leadership. The key is predictability. The moment you start hovering because you feel anxious, you’ve crossed the line.

5. What if I set high standards but my team still doesn’t meet them?

Then you have a people problem, not a standards problem. First, make sure your expectations are specific and measurable. If they are, and someone consistently can’t deliver, you’re not dealing with a performance dip, you’re dealing with a misalignment of role, skill, or attitude. No amount of coaching fixes unwillingness.

6. Are strict processes the same as micromanagement?

No. Process isn’t the enemy. Unnecessary process is. Companies like Google and Spotify use clear standards, best practices, and rituals to create alignment and speed. Standards reduce cognitive load and remove ambiguity, which actually increases autonomy. Micromanagement is when you weaponize process to control people.

7. How do high standards improve team performance?

They eliminate ambiguity, raise the quality bar, shorten decision cycles, and make excellence the default. High standards create what psychologists call a flow-friendly environment: clear expectations, immediate feedback, and a sense of progress. People do their best work when the bar is visible and non-negotiable.

Recommended Course: Driving and Managing Growth

If you’re looking to take your leadership and business consistency to the next level, I highly recommend our Managing Growth course on Growth Leap.

This course dives deep into strategies for aligning your team, scaling your business, and fostering habits that drive sustainable growth. Whether you’re struggling with communication, team management, or prioritization, this program offers actionable tools to help you lead with clarity and consistency.

💡 Why This Course?

  • Learn how to manage growth without losing focus.
  • Develop repeatable systems that keep your team aligned and engaged.
  • Master the art of consistent leadership to drive long-term results.

Check it out and start building the habits that will scale your business effectively.