Here’s something we don’t talk about enough as leaders: The word micromanager gets tossed around way too easily. You give feedback? Micromanaging. You point out areas for improvement? Must be hovering. But here’s the real question: are you actually a control freak—or are your team members just uncomfortable with being held accountable?
At the heart of this issue is a confusion between micromanagement and high standards. They’re not the same, and as a leader committed to building a strong team and driving results, you need to understand the difference. Let’s set the record straight.
Micromanagement gets a bad rap—and for good reason. The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as “controlling every part, however small, of an enterprise or activity.” Investopedia takes it further, describing a micromanager as a boss who “gives excessive supervision to employees.” They check and double-check, criticize constantly, resist delegating, and generally treat their team like they can’t be trusted to do their jobs.
Sound familiar? If it does, you’re probably rolling your eyes. Micromanagement stifles creativity and innovation, makes people feel untrusted, and eventually drives even the most motivated employees to disengage. No leader thrives by clinging to control—and neither do their teams.
High standards, on the other hand, are your greatest tool as a leader. Setting high standards isn’t about control—it’s about empowerment. It’s about defining what success looks like and coaching your team to achieve it. And yes, it can feel uncomfortable for those who aren’t used to being challenged.
Here’s the thing: High standards demand effort, precision, and accountability. They create clarity around expectations:
Standards aren’t micromanagement; they’re the backbone of consistency and excellence. They give your team a clear playbook for success—and hold them accountable when they fall short.
Holding your team to high standards can feel like walking a tightrope. On one hand, you want to empower your team, give them autonomy, and build trust. On the other, you know that without accountability, projects stall, performance dips, and you end up fixing problems that should’ve been avoided.
If you’ve ever felt stuck between being “too soft” or “too controlling,” welcome to the club. It’s hard to balance these competing priorities. And it’s even harder when team members push back or label you the "Evil Micromanager". The frustration is real. But here’s the thing: great leadership is about navigating that tension with clarity and intention.
I also learned that low-performing employees who tend to dodge accountability are often the ones throwing micromanager labels at their boss.
Giving feedback doesn’t make you a micromanager—it makes you a leader. If a team member isn’t meeting expectations, someone has to point it out. That’s not hovering—that’s how they grow. Of course, there's a good and bad way of doing this.
When I worked at plista, we were laser-focused on creating a data-driven culture. For too long, decisions were made based on opinions instead of facts. To turn that around, we implemented standards that demanded accountability:
Was it demanding? Absolutely.
Was it perfect? Absolutely not!
But guess what? It worked. Instead of endless debates over “I think” vs. “I feel,” we made more decisions grounded in reality. It wasn’t micromanaging—it was about building a high-performance culture.
As a leader or founder, it’s important to reflect on your own behavior and check if you’re crossing into micromanagement territory. Here are a few self-check questions to keep yourself accountable:
These questions aren’t just for self-awareness—they’re also a way to course-correct. If you notice signs of micromanagement, shift your focus back to empowering your team to meet the standards you’ve set.
Every high-performing organization operates with standards. Google, for instance, has an entire handbook dedicated to engineering practices, from code reviews to team collaboration. It’s not about stifling creativity; it’s about making sure everyone plays by the same rules. Similarly, Spotify emphasizes autonomy but aligns on best practices through “chapters” to ensure consistency across disciplines.
During my time at plista, I saw firsthand how standards could transform outcomes. By implementing a structured management agenda, demanding data-driven recommendations, and focusing on outcomes over opinions, we created a culture of accountability. The result? Fewer “I think” arguments and more “Here’s what the data shows” discussions.
Here’s your challenge: the next time you give feedback, focus on setting clear expectations and being direct about what success looks like. Push your team to rise to the occasion, but trust them to get there in their own way.
High standards aren’t just about your team’s performance—they’re a reflection of your leadership. By finding the balance between accountability and autonomy, you’ll build a team that’s not just good, but exceptional.
Because at the end of the day, it’s not about micromanaging. It’s about refusing to let your team settle for less than their best. And if someone’s not up for that? Well, maybe it’s time for them to step up—or step out.
If you’d like to transform your team into a better innovation machine that quickly turns ideas into value-creating products and initiatives, check out our Fast-Track Innovation Workshop. This hands-on workshop will give you the tools, strategies, and mindset needed to run effective MVTs and speed up your time to market.
